The Theocracy of Climate Change

0

Leftists count on man-made law to feel moral. Conservatives count on the God that created man to become moral.

Webster’s dictionary defines a theocracy as a government by officials regarded as divinely inspired. In a theocracy, the individual doesn’t have a say in who will run his country or what laws shall be passed. In America we do, at least for now. Regulatory agencies, such as the EPA, have been used by politicians to increasingly chip away at our freedom. In the name of “social justice,” greenhouse profits are redistributed around the world. In the eyes of the leftist, it is the compassionate, right and, yes, even moral thing to do.

Everyone wants a reason to live, a moral cause to champion, something that gives life purpose and meaning. We all want to leave a legacy that matters, but leftists often do it at the expense of their fellow man. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence that the earth has been in a cooling cycle due to sun spots, not warming, as President Obama and other global warming alarmists claim, our president is determined to force his redistributionist values on Americans using “climate change” as his vehicle.

When minor “setbacks” like the ISIS attack in Paris, France, or the Islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino occur, he has no problem minimizing their relevancy. Not just because they don’t fit his political narrative, but because they don’t promulgate his moral one – that America is an immoral nation and the cause of much suffering worldwide.

In other words, in President Obama’s eyes, ISIS is a byproduct of American dominance around the world. It doesn’t matter to him whether or not “man-made” climate change is real; what matters to him is that it can be exploited to right his perceived wrong of America stealing the world’s resources. To Obama, addressing climate change is rectifying a greater evil – even greater than ISIS. That’s why it should come as no surprise to us that Obama spoke just a few miles from the site of the Nov. 13 terrorist attack in the French capital and called for urgent action against a challenge he suggested was greater even than the scourge of terrorism.

Additionally, when Obama quoted the late great civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. during his speech in France, by saying “there is such a thing as being too late,” some of my fellow conservatives were outraged that he would dare make such a comparison. What they don’t understand, however, is that for President Obama the opportunity to redistribute America’s wealth to minorities around the world is his great civil rights issue. Never mind the fact that he has to lie, scheme, steal and make up a fake crisis to accomplish his goal – the right thing to do in his mind is to give poorer nations their money back. As you can see, leftists must abandon the true God to justify their own thievery, as well as create their own moral causes.

What’s most troubling about the climate change conference in Paris is that the tiny island nations and poorest countries that participated are willing to cut their “greenhouse-gas pollution” as long as they receive reparations for “economic and environmental damage stemming from decades of industrial emissions that came mostly from Western industrial powers,” according to the AP. How sad! Instead of spurring ingenuity through capitalism in their own countries and utilizing their natural resources that would help the poorest amongst their populations with jobs, they’d rather rely on power-hungry leaders and corporatist like Obama and Bill Gates to financially support their countries.

Shame on Congress if they provide the research dollars for the “Gates ‘innovation’ initiative.” If they do, it definitely will be a win-win for wealth redistributionist and a lose-lose for poverty-stricken people across the globe. But liberals would have it no other way.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/the-theocracy-of-climate-change/#QrIRGMklXrWOo5cH.99

vv

3 ‘R’S of Left-Wing Academia

0

3 ‘R’s of left-wing academia

When conservatives speak about the three “Rs” of education, we’re referring to reading, writing and arithmetic. When leftists speak of them, they’re referring to racism, revolution and redistribution. And, if you don’t succumb to the demands of protesting spoiled brats like we’ve seen recently at the University of Missouri, Yale, Ithaca College and others, you’re likely to invoke an additional “R” for bonus points – rioting.

If you listen to my show regularly, you’ll often hear me say, “If you have the wrong information, you’ll arrive at the wrong conclusion.” Many university campuses today are filling their students’ minds with a plethora of misinformation. Institutions of higher learning and critical thinking have become little more than indoctrination camps for the Democratic Party. I’m not certain that you could find an era in American history where so many of our youth with high IQs are so dumb and lack common sense.

What’s even worse is when these new little socialist butterflies leave their socialist cocoons called college, they disseminate their anti-American, anti-capitalism propaganda throughout their new found places of employment. If they graduate with a journalism, teaching, business marketing, science or even a sports degree, just to name a few, imagine the effect they’ll have in the propagation of their worldview across the country – not to mention, across all socioeconomic classes.

Frankly, it’s no wonder urban areas tend to be less politically informed and vote heavily Democratic – they expect people who are “successful,” the people who have “made it,” to be more politically informed than they because they have a bachelor’s degree, master’s or doctoral degree. Essentially, they’re elitists with credentials. However, often times these people are less informed because they’ve lived in a socialist bubble for at least four years of their impressionable lives, while being coddled and brainwashed by their leftist professors.

Critical thinking at our universities has been replaced by groupthink. Students aren’t taught to think “out of the box,” but rather not to deviate from the box.

Nationally syndicated radio talk-show host Dennis Prager wrote a column this week titled “American universities begin to implode.” In his column, he described a list of “microaggressions” for the students and faculty of the University of California to avoid, lest they risk engaging in racism or bigotry. One of the examples he gave was this one:

“America is the land of opportunity.”

Prager goes on to explain, “According to the University of California, this is a ‘myth’ that is also racist. It implies that some of those who fail do so not because they haven’t had opportunities to succeed but because of their failure to take advantage of those opportunities.”

Did you catch that? In other words, immigrants from around the world and conservatives who coincidentally look like you and me – who happen to believe “America is the land of opportunity” – are racist for believing blacks should take advantage of the same opportunities as the rest of us.

Allow me to point out the obvious. Many of the minority spoiled brats, who are coddled by the white spoiled brats who often run our universities, attend undergraduate programs that cost more, or as much, per year as 85-90 percent of what the American labor force makes in a year!

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, between 2000 and 2013, the percentage of black college students rose from 11.7 to 14.7. During the same time period, the percentage of Latino student attendees rose from 9.9 to 15.8. Currently, females account for the majority of college students: About 11.5 million enrolled for the 2015 fall semester compared with just 8.7 million males.

How do we stop or slow this leftist onslaught of insanity being perpetrated upon our kids? It’s time to starve the leftist beast. Unless, you’ve vetted a college or university thoroughly, or unless your kid is advancing in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) law, medicine or a specifically defined and skilled profession, consider trade schools or a start-up business. Who knows – like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh, all of whom dropped out of college – maybe your neighbor’s college kid will work for yours one day.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/3-rs-of-left-wing-academia/#tvyl7forjFMZ0QRl.99

 

President Obama Is A Warmonger

0

If I told you more of our troops died in Afghanistan under President Obama than President George W. Bush, would you believe me? It’s true!

According to iCasualties.org, a website dedicated to documenting and remembering coalition military fatalities overseas, 630 U.S. troops died in Afghanistan under Bush 43′s leadership, and to date, a whopping 1,742 troops have died in combat under President Obama’s leadership. I guess when you rename combat “kinetic activity,” the media aren’t obligated to report the truth.

Regardless of how you may feel about war, it was Democrat presidents who led us into some of America’s most tumultuous ones. For instance, it was President Woodrow Wilson who led us into World War I, FDR who led us into World War II, and JFK who led us into Vietnam. However, times have changed. Leftists today would have you believe that pacifism is an attribute to be admired – a position of strength when it comes to confronting enemies of America who would seek to destroy our way of life. What they don’t understand, however, is that pacifism kills more lives than it saves.

I can respect the libertarian isolationists. At least they’ll admit that there are times for war. Specifically, when the homeland itself is attacked. Pacifists like Obama are different. They have the audacity to send troops into combat zones, without any plan or intention of ever winning our battles. The lives of our troops are often sacrificed for political expediency, while the media turn a blind eye. Here’s what the late Christian apologist C.S. Lewis had to say in his book, “Mere Christianity,” about the pacifist:

“War is a dreadful thing, and I can respect an honest pacifist, though I think he is entirely mistaken. What I cannot understand is this sort of semi-pacifism you get nowadays which gives people the idea that though you have to fight, you ought to do it with a long face and as if you were ashamed of it.”

I believe that quote sums up our president’s sentiments exactly. He’s OK with war – excuse me, kinetic activity, as long as he doesn’t have to admit it. It is a fair argument to suggest we should not have invaded Iraq after Sept. 11, although I’d disagree. It should be equally fair to say President Obama should not have haphazardly removed U.S. troops from the region, which incidentally led to the rise of ISIS. Obama’s policies have caused more wars, death and destruction in the Middle East, not fewer.

Furthermore, by aligning our nation with the mullahs of Iran in his unilateral nuke deal, Obama made it clear to our enemies and allies alike that not only was there never any intention to hold the president of Syria Bashar al-Assad to his ridiculous “red line,” ultimately we’d have to help him defend it. Obama’s pacifism has led to the resurgence of Russia under Vladimir Putin, who killed our allies on the ground defending Bashar al-Assad. President Obama, should’ve seen this coming. Unfortunately, pacifists are more concerned with optics than actuality.

Consider Libya, Egypt, Tunisia and the seeming proxy wars that have taken place under Obama’s leadership that have benefitted the Muslim Brotherhood. To this day, no one in his administration has adequately explained why it was crucial to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power in Libya. The nation is now in total chaos.

Additionally, Obama has meddled in the affairs of other sovereign nations in the Middle East far too often. Recall the former dictator of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak. He was a friend to the U.S. But during the uprisings of 2011 in Egypt, our president supported Muslim Brotherhood dictator Mohammed Morsi’s takeover. To Obama’s dismay, in 2013 Morsi would be removed from the presidency by the Egyptian Army and replaced with a man friendly to Western values – President Al-Sisi.

Now, in the last couple of weeks President Obama has sent 50 Special-ops troops into Syria! Why? This man should not be trusted with our military! His wrongful decisions on foreign policy has lead to millions being displaced in the Middle East, Christians being virtually wiped out by ISIS, and our soldiers and allies dying without a just cause.

President Obama hasn’t avoided war! He’s set the stage for World War III, and it’s time Americans knows it.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/president-obama-is-a-warmonger/#WyquojYcCMdW8X4K.99

 

Cruz’s Immigration Plan: Timely Remedy for Amnesty and Syrian Refugee Crisis

0

It’s official! Sen. Ted Cruz’s immigration plan trumps Trump’s!

I expected that the unveiling of his plan would take a back seat to the Islamic terrorist attack in Paris, France, and rightfully so. However, in lieu of the chaos, presidents will be forced to make many decisions during their tenure that will affect the safety and security of the American people. The Paris attack gave us a chance to see how our candidates would respond if an event like that occured during their administration. In a world with an ever increasing threat of an ISIS attack, immigration is no longer a matter of migration and sovereignty alone – it’s a matter of national security.

I attended a rally for Sen. Ted Cruz last Friday. It was held at Faith Assembly of God, a local mega-church in Orlando, Florida. Sen. Cruz made a brief appearance in order to give a speech and shake hands with some of his supporters. He, along with all of the other GOP presidential candidates, was scheduled to speak at the Sunshine Summit across town. As an esteemed member of the press (yeah right), I was handed two sheets of paper prior to his arrival at the church from a member of his campaign team.

What I read made it clear that our federal government, particularly the White House, would no longer be in the business of importing terrorists or exporting American jobs under a Cruz administration.

Cruz’s plan doesn’t explicitly address the deportation of the estimated 11 million illegal foreigners residing within our nation’s borders currently. Nonetheless, it’s almost certain that self deportation would be the end result of his plan. Self deportation is a more viable option than Donald Trump’s plan to corral illegal foreigners and throw them out, considering the divided and often feckless Congress in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Cruz wisely divided his plan into three categories. All of which are essential in restoring our immigration system, Judeo-Christian heritage, healthy job wages and national sovereignty. The plan entails how he would secure the border, restore the rule of law, and reform legal immigration to protect Americans. Within each category Sen. Cruz offered specific and in depth objectives to implement his plan, along with a “promise” to see it through. I’ve listed them all below in bold face lettering, along with my own brief commentary (not in bold face) as to why each is essential for a border plan going forward:

1.) Secure the border

A.) Build a wall that works. After passing legislation in 2006 to complete a 700 mile fence across our southern border and having it signed by then President George W. Bush, Congress managed to build a menial 36 miles worth of fence. Ted Cruz promised to “complete” the remaining 664 miles worth of concrete enforced fencing.

B. Triple the number of border patrol agents. The federal government is obligated to enforce our border laws. Having more man power will help in that effort and let the countries south of our border know we mean business.

C. Increase vital aerial surveillance and other technology along the border. Although I’m skeptical of the effectiveness of this particular aspect of securing our border security, Sen. Cruz argues that “eyes in the sky and other equipment are necessary to find and detain all illegal entrants.”

D.) Finish the biometric tracking system at our nation’s ports of entry. Approximately 60 percent of illegal foreigners that enter our country legally on temporary visa programs never leave. A tracking system is crucial to curtail that.

2.) Restore the rule of law.

A.) End President Obama’s illegal amnesty. Sen. Cruz promises to rescind each of Obama’s 20 executive orders that has fomented illegal immigration his first day in office. Having argued before the Supreme Court nine times, I tend to believe he knows what he’s doing.

B.) Increase deportations and end catch-and-release. Deportations and returns have to be taken seriously. Ted Cruz has promised to rededicate the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to “fully enforcing the law.”

C.) End sanctuary policies. Sanctuary cities are a spit in the face to those who immigrated to our country legally. They undermine any incentive for illegal foreigners to assimilate. This must be stopped! Three hundred-forty jurisdictions in the U.S. refuse to enforce our immigration laws. Cruz has promised to sign “Kate’s law, and deport criminal immigrants.”

D.) Prohibit illegal immigrants from receiving financial benefits and strengthen E-Verify. People who broke our border laws don’t deserve welfare from U.S. citizens. Additionally, American jobs should go to Americans. This policy will help accomplish that objective.

3.) Reform legal immigration to protect Americans.

A.) Suspend the issuance of all H-1B visas for 180 days to complete a comprehensive investigation and audit of pervasive allegations of abuse of the program. Ted Cruz also promised to “initiate an immediate 90-day investigation and audit” of the H-1B visa program to protect American jobs. I would like more details on this.

B.) Halt any increases in immigration so long as American unemployment remains unacceptably high. Until American workers are near full employment it makes no sense to saturate the low skilled labor market and drive down wages.

C.) Enforce the public-charge doctrine. I love this! If you come to this country it is incumbent upon you and no one else to take care of yourself! Let’s restore the “American Dream” not the “Great society.”

D.) End birthright citizenship. As a black American it is offensive how our 14th Amendment is being used to justify lawless acts by illegal foreigners when it was written to protect freedmen! Sen. Cruz promises to “take steps to pass legislation or a constitutional amendment to end it.”

America is the only industrialized nation in the modern world with weak border policy. Other candidates are “campaigning” about what they’d do to secure the border, but knowing what we know about Sen. Cruz, he’s just speaking truth.

http://townhall.com/columnists/carljackson/2015/11/19/cruzs-immigration-plan-timely-remedy-for-amnesty-and-syrian-refugee-crisis-n2082611/page/full

5 Must-Dos to Prevent An ISIS Attack in America

1

Jihadi John? Christian Carmen? Buddhist Bob? Hindu Harry? Which name sounds most threatening to you? Which one would you trust the least standing next to you while holding a knife in the kitchen or a gun at the shooting range? Which would you be most fearful to confront in a dark alley? Which one would you feel most comfortable inviting into your home? Which one would be more likely to strap a suicide vest on and blow innocent civilians up at a cafe or in a theater? Be honest with yourself.

I wish I could say with confidence that a Paris-style attack by ISIS isn’t likely to occur on American soil. I can’t. They’re here. Contrary to President Obama’s words, they are not “contained.” They’re on the march, and Americans are in their way. While Democrats work to remove God from any and every vestige of American culture possible, in the name of “liberty,” Islamists seek to impose a worldwide government, known as the caliphate, in the name of their God. By doing so they believe they’ll be liberated. I’m afraid Democrats won’t get it until it’s too late, until Shariah law is the law of the land. Do you believe that’s irrational? Far too many Muslims don’t.

Even with the best intelligence and fighting forces in the world, an ISIS attack on American soil seems inevitable. According to Breitbart.com, several ISIS members have been caught on our border attempting to enter the U.S., posing as Syrian refugees. Couple that with the fact that we have a president in the White House that’s quick to condemn Christians and slow to rebuke “Islamic” terrorists, and we have a recipe for disaster. However, all hope is not lost. There are still things that can be done by our government, in addition to things you and I can do to prevent a catastrophic terrorists attack on our homeland. Here they are:

  1. Close our borders and issue a temporary moratorium on all legal immigration. Donald Trump has been excellent when it comes to border policy. However, just last week presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz unveiled an even more comprehensive immigration plan that included completing a 700-mile border fence across the southern border, a six-month moratorium on all legal immigration as well, and ending federal funding to “sanctuary cities.” Border policy is a matter of national security, not just national sovereignty.
  2. Stop appeasing Muslims! I’m sorry, there’s no moral equivalency between a Judeo-Christian society and an Islamic society. The former is based on liberty and the rule of law, the latter is a coerced theocracy. It’s time for sensible Muslims to rise up and rebuke the Jihadists in their ranks!
  3. Support your Second Amendment right! If you don’t already own a gun, buy one! Make sure you receive adequate training for safety and effective use, in the event you need to discern and kill a bad guy. Wouldn’t it have been nice if one of those helpless French victims that were shot one-by-one in the theater were armed? How many lives could’ve been saved? Remember, police arrive at crime scenes after they occur.
  4. When potential terrorists are placed on a “watch list,” watch them for God’s sake! If they conspire to commit or coordinate a terrorist act, ship them and their immediate family back to the hottest desert you can find in the Middle East.
  5. Ridicule and shame Hollywood elitists and academia. Saul Alinsky, author of “Rules for Radicals,” understood this tactic very well. Whoopi Goldberg should be ashamed for sitting on national television and wrongly calling “agnostic” Timothy McVeigh a Christian, then comparing his one terrorist attack to thousands of Islamic terrorist attacks perpetrated upon innocent civilians worldwide since the Oklahoma City bombing. Likewise, Madonna needs to get a clue! “Unconditional love” isn’t enough to change a core ideological belief – particularly when Muslim terrorists are hoping to achieve the type of lifestyle in heaven Madonna currently lives by killing infidels like her. What an idiot!

Sadly, if we’re going to win this war waged upon the U.S. and Western civilization by Islamists hoping to quicken the return of the Mahdi and the second coming of Jesus Christ, not only will we have to kill ISIS and Islamic Jihadists all across the globe, we’re going to have to defeat the complicit leftists in America at the ballot box and in the arena of ideas.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/5-must-dos-to-prevent-isis-attack-in-america/#cqI2yk5YqETcDyUc.99

 

Journalism Dean Caught “Lying While Black”

1

Unless you’re a liberal, you’ve probably never heard of Dorothy Bland. She recently wrote a column for the Dallas Morning News entitled “I was caught ‘walking while black,’” after claiming she was stopped by two white police officers in her own neighborhood for simply exercising. It provoked a great deal of response from people empathetic to her plight all across the nation. The problem? Chica was straight up lyin’!

Dorothy Bland wasn’t guilty of “walking while black” as she professed in her column. In fact, she was only stopped for safety purposes. She was unable to hear the pickup truck directly behind her that could’ve flattened her like a pancake. Neither was she able to hear the subsequent Corinth police squad car that pulled up behind her, which required that the officers flash the lights of their patrol car to get her attention. They didn’t turn on the siren. I suppose they didn’t want to embarrass or startle her. And why couldn’t she hear the vehicles that could’ve introduced her to Jesus sooner than later? I’ll tell you why. Dorothy Bland was wearing earbuds as she took her morning stroll in the middle of the freakin’ road! Isn’t that just like a liberal to act like they’re entitled to roads we all share – minus the spandex and over-priced bicycle?

The officers weren’t harassing her! They were helping her! They even went so far as to advise her to walk facing traffic so that she’d be aware of an oncoming vehicle, in the event she had to jump out of the way. There encounter was brief and cordial.

This is what’s wrong with black America today. It’s become more popular to be a self-proclaimed victim of “pretend racism” than it is to be a successful educator, as Dorothy Bland is. That’s right! Dorothy Bland is the dean of the Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School of Journalism and the director for the Frank W. Mayborn Graduate Institute of Journalism at the University of Texas. Despite her impressive resume, Bland felt a need to bolster her “street cred” rather than to simply tell the truth. I have to wonder if she would’ve even considered pulling such a stunt pre-President Obama and the Black Lives Matter movement. And consider what could’ve gone wrong! She could’ve provoked riots and even more cop killing.

I miss the days when educators were amongst the group of people you could trust. Keep in mind, Dorothy Bland is in charge of staff and students at a school of journalism! With deans like this, is there any wonder so many journalists today shape the news rather than report the news?

On more than one occasion, Bland emphasized in her column that she was wearing a “hoodie.” She even went so far as to write “I had no interest in my life’s story playing out like Trayvon Martin’s death.” Furthermore she invoked the names of Freddie Gray and Sandra Bland – two black people who died while in police custody. Are you kidding me?! Unless she tackled a complete stranger to the ground after sucker punching him in the face, performing MMA-style ground and pound on the victim like she was training for the UFC, all the while slamming the victim’s head unto the concrete, why would she end up like Trayvon Martin?

What a missed opportunity. Instead of using her influence to show blacks how to properly behave when stopped by cops, she showed us what to do to perpetuate racial divisiveness – and to receive attaboys from “virtual friends.” How sick is that?

Ms. Bland lives in a well-to-do neighborhood in Corinth, Texas, a predominantly white neighborhood. Do you know why she chose that neighborhood to reside in? I’ll tell you. White affluent neighborhoods are a whole lot safer for blacks than predominantly minority neighborhoods. Dorothy Bland’s ‘hood was so safe she had to create a fairytale to try and relate to us peons.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/journalism-dean-caught-lying-while-black/#5Q8vai80IiGCPo2H.99